Inclusionary zoning is a policy approach to addressing the affordable housing crisis in the United States. It requires developers to set aside a certain percentage of new housing units for affordable housing, either by including affordable units in their developments or by contributing to a fund that supports the development of affordable housing elsewhere in the community. We want to explore some of the benefits and challenges of inclusionary zoning as a tool for helping to create more affordable housing options in our communities.

The benefits of inclusionary zoning are clear. By requiring developers to include affordable housing units in their developments, communities can ensure that there are affordable housing options available for low- and moderate-income families. In addition, inclusionary zoning can help to promote economic diversity and prevent the displacement of low-income residents from gentrifying neighborhoods. Furthermore, by requiring developers to contribute to a fund that supports the development of affordable housing elsewhere in the community, inclusionary zoning can help to address the affordable housing crisis on a broader scale.

Another benefit to developers within most inclusionary zoning policies is the ability to construct larger buildings through increased square footage and height multipliers. This increase in development potential is meant to encourage a higher unit count without negatively affecting surround existing properties. This increase in the total number of units generally ensures the project will be more profitable even though some units must be rented for less due to affordable requirements within the inclusionary zone.

However, there are also challenges associated with inclusionary zoning. One of the main challenges is that it can be difficult to implement in a way that is effective and fair. For example, some developers may argue that inclusionary zoning limits their ability to make a profit, which is a minority occurrence. Others may simply choose to pay the required fees rather than including affordable units in their developments. Additionally, inclusionary zoning can be difficult to enforce, particularly if there is not enough demand for affordable housing units in a given area.

Image Credit - American Planning Association

Another challenge associated with inclusionary zoning is that it may not be a sufficient solution to the affordable housing crisis on its own. In order to truly address the issue, communities may need to implement a variety of policy solutions, such as increasing funding for affordable housing programs, providing tax incentives for developers who build affordable housing units, and implementing rent control.

Despite these challenges, inclusionary zoning remains a viable policy solution for creating more affordable housing in the United States. It has been successful in a number of cities, including San Francisco, New York City, and Washington, D.C. In addition, research has shown that inclusionary zoning can be an effective way to increase the supply of affordable housing units and promote economic diversity in communities.

Inclusionary Zoning and Affordable Housing

Stay in touch.